Loading

Skip to content

..:..--..:..--..:..--..:..--..:..--..:..--....:..--..:..--..:..--..:..--..:..--..:..--....:..--..:..--..:..--..:..--..:..--..:..--..

Loading

One question. One place. One time. The school atlas remains as a quiet map of where Y School can eventually grow.

School atlas

Mapped schools
School atlas
SEND & special schools
Rankings

© 2026 Y School · A question becomes a roomPrivacy

Home
Compare

Liverpool Life Sciences UTC vs Progress Schools - Liverpool

Side-by-side overall scores and the six-dimension breakdown

Liverpool Life Sciences UTC

Liverpool, North West

SecondaryUTC

Progress Schools - Liverpool

Liverpool, North West

SecondaryIndependent

Public-data summary

5.1

No score

Official-data breakdown

Achievement

4.7

—

Attendance

4.9

—

Destinations

5.4

—

Inclusion

—

—

Official Data

Progress 8

-0.34

Attainment 8

41.3

No data available

Key Facts

Age Range

14–19

Gender

Co-ed

Type

UTC

Age Range

11–16

Gender

Co-ed

Type

Independent

Resources

4.4

—

Stability

—

—

Liverpool Life Sciences UTC vs Progress Schools - Liverpool — Compare UK Schools | y.school