Loading

Skip to content

..:..--..:..--..:..--..:..--..:..--..:..--....:..--..:..--..:..--..:..--..:..--..:..--....:..--..:..--..:..--..:..--..:..--..:..--..

Loading

One question. One place. One time. The school atlas remains as a quiet map of where Y School can eventually grow.

School atlas

Mapped schools
School atlas
SEND & special schools
Rankings

© 2026 Y School · A question becomes a roomPrivacy

Home
Compare

Spring Grove School 2003 Ltd vs The Norton Knatchbull School

Side-by-side overall scores and the six-dimension breakdown

Spring Grove School 2003 Ltd

Ashford, South East

PrimaryIndependent

The Norton Knatchbull School

Ashford, South East

SecondaryAcademy

Public-data summary

No score

7.3

Official-data breakdown

Achievement

—

8.8

Attendance

—

7.4

Destinations

—

7.0

Inclusion

—

—

Official Data

No data available

Ofsted

Good

Progress 8

+0.32

Attainment 8

64.2

Key Facts

Age Range

2–11

Gender

Co-ed

Type

Independent

Age Range

11–18

Gender

boys

Type

Academy

Resources

—

5.8

Stability

—

—

Spring Grove School 2003 Ltd vs The Norton Knatchbull School — Compare UK Schools | y.school